Alevtina Ibragimova vs Linda Fruhvirtova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Linda Fruhvirtova has a second serve win rate of 37.17% over the past six months, slightly lower than Alevtina Ibragimova's 39.44%. Could this minor edge indicate a potential advantage for Ibragimova?
• Return Game Strength: Fruhvirtova excels with a 51.57% win rate on opponents' second serve points, trumping Ibragimova's 50.37%. Yet, Ibragimova has a superior win rate on first serve returns at 34.36% versus Fruhvirtova’s 28.76%.
• Handling Pressure: Fruhvirtova has a breakpoint save rate of 48.65%, just shy of Ibragimova's 49.18%. Could Ibragimova's marginally better pressure handling sway in-game predictions?
• Overall Match Performance: Over the past year, Fruhvirtova boasts a 58.62% match win rate while Ibragimova is close behind at 56.25%.
• Surface Preferences: Fruhvirtova excels on indoor hard courts (59%), while her clay performance dips (41%). Ibragimova's top surface is hard courts (59%), yet she performs worst on indoor hard (60%).
• Competitiveness Level: Fruhvirtova achieves 68.75% match success in Challenger/ITF tournaments > $10K, compared to Ibragimova's 56.25% win rate in similar levels.
• Opponent Quality: Fruhvirtova faces higher-ranked opponents with an average ranking of 203.6, unlike Ibragimova who competes against an average rank of 366.59.
• Deciding Set Performance: Fruhvirtova has a slight edge with a 61% deciding set win rate, compared to Ibragimova's 57%.
• Breakpoint Conversion Rate: Ibragimova's conversion rate of 44.70% leads over Fruhvirtova's 32.61% in recent matches.

Editorial Prediction (December 4, 2025, UTC):

Linda Fruhvirtova and Alevtina Ibragimova present a closely matched competition with both players showing strengths in different areas. Fruhvirtova dominates the return game on opponents’ second serves, a crucial aspect that could turn the tide in her favor, especially if Ibragimova’s first serve consistency falters.

Ibragimova, however, capitalizes on breakpoint conversion with superior efficiency, indicating a potential edge during critical game moments. Additionally, her slightly superior performance in saving breakpoints under pressure suggests resilience in tight situations.

The decisive factor may rest on surface preference and competitive experience, where Fruhvirtova’s significant experience against higher-caliber opponents and her slight leading performance in high-stakes sets hints at a tactical advantage.

Predicting the likely victor, Linda Fruhvirtova’s blend of second serve returns and adaptive play against stronger opponents positions her as the probable winner in this match. However, slight technical and tactical advantages observed in Ibragimova should not be underestimated, making it a closely contested encounter.